Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Byrne's avatar

It's a family dispute and it can definitively be overcome, and at the very least should be attempted whole heartedly. However, if it can't, then Poole, undoubtably, is the one who should be traded, not Draymond. If Greene is traded, that seismic shift in dynamics would be akin to the "jumping the shark" death knell felt by TV shows who kill off a favored character. The demise of the Warriors would be precipitous and immediate, and there would be no coming back from it either. We can't put a statistical finger on why Dray makes the Warriors better, but we know that he does. Likewise Dray would never be that impactful on another team either. His career would die and whither the moment he dons another uni. Likewise Curry might still be a statistical juggernaut, but his team would whither under the weight of mediocrity until his retirement, and poor Clay will will become a forgotten footnote in annals of the NBA. However, Jordan would thrive almost anywhere else. In fact it might be his best option. He isn't integral to the chemistry, and it's obvious that his personality is somewhat grating, at least to Draymond. Let him go and make a name for himself somewhere else if he and Dray can't put this behind them.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts